Skip to Main Content

Systematic Reviews in Health Sciences: Start Here

About This Tutorial

This self-paced tutorial helps you conduct a literature search for your systematic review in the health sciences. 

Follow the ✅ Action Steps to grow your search skills and build a comprehensive strategy for finding health research.

Understanding Systematic Reviews

A systematic review attempts to identify, appraise and synthesize all the empirical evidence that meets pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a specific research question.

Researchers conducting systematic reviews use explicit, systematic methods that are selected with a view aimed at minimizing bias, to produce more reliable findings to inform decision making. 

Source: Cochrane

✅ Action 1: Is a Systematic Review Right for You?

Determine whether your research question and your timeline fit a systematic review.

Sometimes another type of evidence synthesis, such as a literature (narrative) review, may be more appropriate.

Different review types have different goals, methods, and workload. Select the review method that aligns with your research question and matches the time and resources you have.

➡️ Do this


📚 Learn more about the 14 review types and how they differ in purpose and process.

🔑 Key Points

  • A systematic review is a team-based, publication-level research project. It requires at least three researchers and typically takes 15.5 months to complete (Borah et al., 2017).

  • A literature review is appropriate for coursework, theses, and research background. It can be “systematized” (using some systematic review techniques) without meeting all the requirements of a full systematic review.

At a Glance:

Systematic Review vs. Literature Review

Criteria

Systematic Review

Literature (Narrative) Review

Research Team

Team-based (3+ researchers)

Can be completed by one researcher

Purpose

Publication-level research

Coursework, theses, dissertations, background in research articles

Methods

Requires protocol, predefined methods

Flexible, may not follow a set protocol

Searching

Exhaustive, reproducible across multiple databases

Selective, focuses on most relevant studies

Timeline

15.5 months

Weeks to months

Process

Rigorous screening, appraisal, data extraction, and synthesis

Summarizes and synthesizes themes

Outcome

Highest level of evidence synthesis

Provides background and context